Litteratur

Feminism och vetenskap i historiskt och kritiskt perspektiv, 15 högskolepoÀng

Giltig fr.o.m.: HT2021
Giltig t.o.m.:
Beslutsdatum: 2021-05-12
Beslutad av: ÄmnesrĂ„det för Genusvetenskap

All litteratur Àr obligatorisk.

Böcker:

  • Braidotti, Rosi (1994/2011): Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory, Second edition New York: Colombia University Press. (S. 116-166)   


  • Butler, Judith & Joan W. Scott (red.) (1992): Feminists theorize the political, New York: Routledge. 

  

  • Harding, Sandra (red.) (2004): The feminist standpoint theory reader. Intellectual and political controversies, New York & London: Routledge.   


Artiklar och kapitel i böcker: 

  • Ahmed, Sara (2007): “A phenomenology of whiteness”, Feminist Theory, 8:2, s. 149-168.  


  • Allen, Amy (2015): “Emancipation without utopia: Subjection, modernity, and the normative claims of feminist critical theory”, Hypatia, 30:3, s. 513-529.  


  • Benhabib, Seyla (1995): “Feminism and postmodernism: An uneasy alliance”, i Benhabib, Seyla, Judith Butler, Drucilla Cornell & Nancy Fraser: Feminist contentions. A philosophical exchange, New York: Routledge. s. 17- 34  


  • Birke, Lynda and Holmberg Tora (2018): “Intersections: The animal question meets feminist theory”, i Åsberg, Cecilia & Rosi Braidotti (red.) A feminist companion to the posthumanities, Cham: Springer.   


  • Braidotti, Rosi (2016): “Posthuman feminist theory”, i Lisa Disch & Mary Hawkesworth (red.) The Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  


  • Brown, Wendy (1993): “Wounded attachments”, Political Theory, 21:3, s. 390-410.


  • Butler, Judith (1992): “Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism”, i Butler, Judith & Joan W Scott (red.): Feminists theorize the political, New York: Routledge. s. 3-21.  


  • Collins, Patricia Hill (1986/2004): “Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought”, i Harding, Sandra (red.): The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies, New York & London: Routledge, s. 103-126.  


  • Collins, Patricia Hill (1999): ”Moving beyond gender: Intersectionality and scientific knowledge”, i Ferree, Myra Marx, Lorber, Judith & Hess Beth B. (red.): Revisioning gender, Thousand oaks: Sage, s. 261-284.  


  • Cvetkovich, Ann (2012): “Depression is ordinary: Public feelings and Saidiya Hartman’s Lose Your Mother”. Feminist Theory, 13:2, s. 131-146.  


  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé (2003): ”Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color”, i Identies: race, class, gender, and nationality (red.) Linda Martín Alcoff & Eduardo Mendieta (Malden, MA). Finns också på nätet (onumrerat): http://www.wcsap.org/Events/Workshop07/mapping-margins.pdf, (19 s.)   


  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne (1993):” The five sexes: Why male and female are not enough”, The Sciences, March/April 1993, s. 20-25.   


  • Fraser, Nancy (1996): “Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation, The Tanner lectures on human values, https://www.intelligenceispower.com/Important%20E-mails%20Sent%20attachments/Social%20Justice%20in%20the%20Age%20of%20Identity%20Politics.pdf   


  • Grimshaw, Jean (1986): Feminist philosophers, women’s perspectives on philosophical traditions, Brighton: Wheatsheaf, s. 75-103. 


  • Grosz, Elizabeth (1995): “Sexual difference and the problem of essentialism”, i Space, time and perversion: Essays on the politics of bodies, New York: Routledge, s. 45-58.


  • Harding, Sandra (1986): “From the woman question in science to the science question in feminism”, i The Science Question in Feminism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, s. 15-29.  


  • Harding, Sandra (2004): “Introduction: Standpoint theory as a site of political, philosophic, and scientific debates”, i Harding, Sandra (red.): The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies, New York & London: Routledge, s. 1-15.  


  • Hartsock, Nancy (1983/2004): “The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically historical materialism”, Harding, Sandra (red.): The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies, New York & London: Routledge, s. 35-53.  


  • Hemmings, Clare (2012): ”Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation”, Feminist Theory, 13:2, s. 147-161.


  • Irigaray, Luce (1985): “When our lips speak together”, i This sex which is not one, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, s. 205-218. 


  • Mohanty C. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review. 1988;30(1):61-88. doi:10.1057/fr.1988.42


  • Probyn, Elspeth (2010): “Writing shame” i Gregg, Melissa & Seigworth, Gregory (red.): The Affect Theory Reader, Durham: Duke University Press, s. 71-90.