Retorik C, 30 högskolepoÀng

Delkurs: Teori och metod 7,5 hp

Obligatorisk litteratur

 

Baum, L.M. 2012, "It's Not Easy Being Green . Or Is It? A Content Analysis of Environmental Claims in Magazine Advertisements from the United States and United Kingdom", Environmental communication, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 423-440. [18s]

 

Bengtson, E. 2019. The Epistemology of Rhetoric: Plato, Doxa and Post-Truth. Uppsala: Uppsala university, pp. 125-214. [90 s.]Bizup, Joseph. 2008. “BEAM: A Rhetorical Vocabulary for Teaching Research-Based Writing”. Rhetoric Review, 27:1, s. 72–86. [14 s.]

 

Bottici, C. 2014. Imaginal politics: Images beyond imagination and the imaginary. Columbia University Press. [203s]

Campbell, Karlyn K. 2002. “Consiousness-raising: Linking Theory, Criticism, and Practice”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 32: 1, s. 45-64. [9 s.]

 

Entman, Robert M. (1993). “Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm”,Journal of Communication, 43 (4), s. 51-58 [7 s.]. 

 

Frandsen, F. & Johansen, W. 2011, "Rhetoric, Climate Change, and Corporate Identity Management", Management communication quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 511-530. [20s]

Goodnight, G. Thomas. 2015. “Rhetoric and Communication: Alternative Worlds of Inquiry”. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101:1, 145-150, DOI: 10.1080/00335630.2015.999982 [5 s.]

 

Kjeldsen, Jens E. (2017). Audience Analysis and Reception Studies of Rhetoric. In Rhetorical Audience Studies and Reception of Rhetoric (Rhetoric, Politics and Society, pp. 1-42). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [42 s.]

 

Kuypers, Jim A. (2009). “Framing analysis from a rhetorical perspective”, Doing News Framing Analysis : Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, Jim A. Kuypers, and Paul D'Angelo, red., Hoboken: Taylor & Francis, s. 286-311 [25 s.].

 

Mazzoleni, Gianpietro. (2008). ”Media Logic” och “Mediatization”, L. L. Kaid & C. Holtz-Bacha, red., Encyclopedia of political communication. Thousand Oak: SAGE Publications, s. 446-448. [2 s.] 

 

Smerecnik, K. R. & Renegar, V. R. 2010. ”Capitalistic Agency: The Rhetoric of BP’s Helios Power Campaign”, Environmental Communication, vol 4:2, pp 152–171 [20s]

 

Rienecker, L., Stray Jþrgensen, Peter, & Lagerhammar, Ann. (2018). Att skriva en bra uppsats (Upplaga 4. ed.). Stockholm: Liber, s. 100–237. [ca 140 s.]

 

Viklund, Jon, Mehrens, Patrik & Fischer, Otto (red.). 2014. Retorisk kritik: teori och metod i retorisk analys. ÖdĂ„kra: Retorikförlaget [valda delar, ca 100 s.]

 

WÊraas, A. & Ihlen, Ø. 2009, "Green legitimation: the construction of an environmental ethos", International journal of organizational analysis (2005), vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 84-102. [19s]

Zarefsky, David. 2008. ”Knowledge Claims in Rhetorical Criticism”. Journal of Communication, 58, s. 629–640. [31 s.]

 

Warnick, Barbara. 2004. "The ethos of Rhetorical Criticism". I: Hyde, Michael J. The ethos of rhetoric. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, s. 56-74. [18 s.]

 

Tillkommer cirka 100 sidor i anslutning till seminarieuppgifter.

 

Totalt cirka 723  sidor.

 

Referenslitteratur

Agnafors, Marcus & Levinsson, Magnus. (2019). Att tÀnka uppsats: det vetenskapliga arbetets grundstruktur. Malmö: Gleerups.

 

Alvesson, Mats & Sköldberg, Kaj.2008. Tolkning och reflektion: vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod. 2., [uppdaterade] uppl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

 

Hartman, Jan. 2004. Vetenskapligt tÀnkande: frÄn kunskapsteori till metodteori. 2., [utök. och kompletterade] uppl. Lund: Studentlitteratur

 

Porrovecchio, Mark J. & Condit, Celeste M. (eds.). 2016. Contemporary Rhetorical Theory: A Reader, second edition. New York: The Guilford Press.

 

Rienecker, L., Stray JĂžrgensen, Peter, & Lagerhammar, Ann. (2018). Att skriva en bra uppsats (Upplaga 4. ed.). Stockholm: Liber.

Ödman, Per-Johan. 2007. Tolkning, förstĂ„else, vetande: hermeneutik i teori och praktik. 2., [omarb.] uppl. Stockholm: Norstedts akademiska förlag.

 

 

Delkurs: Tematisk fördjupning, 7,5 hp

Retorik i glappet mellan kunskap och beteende i klimatfrÄgor (HT21)

 

Obligatorisk litteratur:

Arjen Wals, film pĂ„ youtube - An introduction to wicked sustainability problems? youtube.com/watch?v=1erCuhNVg6k.

 

Attari, S. Z., Krantz, D. H., & Weber, E. U. (2016). Statements about climate researchers’ carbon footprints affect their credibility and the impact of their advice. Climatic Change, 138(1), 325–338. (13s)

 

Dilling, Lisa, & Moser, Susanne C, S. (2011). Communicating climate change: Closing the science-action gap. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. OUP Oxford, 161-174 (13s)

 

Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. The American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. (12s)

 

Kahan, D. M., Wittlin, M., Peters, E., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. N. (2011). The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1871503). (31 s)

 

Kahan, D. M. (2014). Making Climate Science Evidence Based—All the Way Down. In D. A. Crow & M. T. Boykoff (Eds.), Culture, Politics and Climate Change: How Information Shapes our Common Future (pp. 203–220). Routledge. (17 s)

 

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. (41 s)

 

Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J. T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J. C., MĂŒller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3. (5s)

 

Moser, S. C. (2007). More bad news: The risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information. In Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change, pp. 64–80. (16 s)

 

Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life. MIT Press. (278s)

Randall, R. (2009). Loss and Climate Change: The Cost of Parallel Narratives. Ecopsychology, 1(3), 118–129. (12 s)

 

Wolrath Söderberg, M. (2017). Kritisk sjĂ€lvreflektion i komplexa frĂ„gor: Att hjĂ€lpa studenterna att ta makten över sitt tĂ€nkande. Högre Utbildning, 7(2), 77–90. (13 s)

 

Wolrath Söderberg, M., & Wormbs, N. (2019). Grounded: Beyond Flygskam. Stockholm: Fores. (63s)

 

Wolrath Söderberg, Maria & Wormbs, Nina (accepted for publication). “Internal Deliberation Defending Climate-harmful Behavior” in Argumentation. Springer (39s)

 

DÀrutöver kan tillkomma ytterligare litteratur i samrÄd med lÀraren som gÀller exempelvis analysmetoder, teori eller exempel pÄ forskning (max 300s).

 

Totalt ca 575 sidor.

 

 

Delkurs: SjÀlvstÀndigt arbete, 15 hp

 

Referenslitteratur:

Agnafors, Marcus & Levinsson, Magnus (2019). Att tÀnka uppsats : det vetenskapliga arbetets grundstruktur. Malmö: Gleerups.

 

Booth, Wayne C., Colomb, Gregory G., Williams, Joseph M., Bizup, Joseph & Fitzgerald, William T. (2016). The Craft of Research. Fourth edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

 

Rienecker, L., Stray JĂžrgensen, Peter, & Lagerhammar, Ann. (2018). Att skriva en bra uppsats (Upplaga 4. ed.). Stockholm: Liber.

Svenska akademiens ordlista över svenska sprÄket. (2006 [eller nyare]), 13. uppl. [eller nyare] Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.

 

Karlsson, O., & SprĂ„krĂ„det. (2017). Svenska skrivregler (FjĂ€rde upplagan. ed., SprĂ„krĂ„dets skrifter ; 22). Stockholm: Liber.