Retorik C, 30 högskolepoäng

Tematisk fördjupning: Retoriskt medborgarskap 

Obligatorisk litteratur:

Arendt, Hannah. 2016. Människans villkor : vita activa Andra upplagan., Göteborg: Daidalos, s. 33–56, 80–83. [28 s.] 

Bone, Jennifer Emerling, Griffin Cindy L. & Scholz, T. M. Linda (2008) ”Beyond Traditional Conceptualizations of Rhetoric: Invitational Rhetoric and a Move Toward Civility”, Western Journal of Communication, 72:4, 434-462, DOI: 10.1080/10570310802446098 [29 s.] 

Brumark, Åsa, ”Medborgarfostran och elevinflytande i skolans offentlighet”, Rhetorica Scandinavica 59 (2011): 54 – 68 [15 s.] 

Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs (2005) ”Agency: Promiscuous and Protean”, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 2:1, 1-19, DOI: 10.1080/1479142042000332134 [19 s.]

 

Englund, Tomas. 2004. ”Deliberativa samtal i ljuset av deliberativ demokrati - en fråga om att utveckla deliberativa förhållningssätt”. I Deliberativ demokrati, redigerad av Rune Premfors och Klas Roth, 57–76. Lund: Studentlitteratur. [20 s.] 

Foss, Sonja K. & Griffin, Cindy L. 2015/1995. "Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric". Glenn, C. & Lunsford, A.A. (red.). Landmark essays on rhetoric and feminism: 1973-2000. New York: Routledge, s. 209-227. [19 s.] 

Foucault, Michel. 2001. Fearless speech. Los Angeles, Ca.: Semiotext(e, s. 11-24, 77-87. [25 s.] 

Frey, Reana. ”’How Dare You’: Greta Thunberg, Parrhesia, and Rhetorical Citizenship – Present Tense”. Present Tense. A Journal of Rhetoric in Society 9, nr 1 (2021). http://www.presenttensejournal.org/volume-9/how-dare-you-greta-thunberg-parrhesia-and-rhetorical-citizenship/. 

Glenn, Cheryl. 2004. Unspoken: a Rhetoric of Silence. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, s. 1–48, 150–160. [60 s.] 

Hariman, Robert. (2004), ”Civic Education, Classical Imitation, and Democratic Polity”, Poulakos, T. & Depew, D.J. (red.). 2004. Isocrates and Civic Education. (1st ed.) Austin: University of Texas Press, s. 217– 234. [18 s.] 

Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth, Christine Isager og Lisa Storm Villadsen. “Retorisk agency – Hvad skaber retorikken?”, i: Rhetorica Scandinavica 33 (2005): 56 – 65. [11 s.]

 

Hogarth, Claire, Matthiesen, Christina & Bakken, Jonas (2022) ”Advancing citizenship through language arts education: conceptions of rhetoric in Scandinavian national curricula”, i: Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54:4, 559-575, DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2021.1989050 [17 s.] 

Hogan, J. Michael et al (red.) 2017. Speech and Debate as Civic Education. Pennsylvania State University Press [368 s.] [Urval om ca 100 s.] 

Karlsson Sjögren, Åsa, Larsson, Esbjörn & Rimm, Stefan (2019) Agents and subjects: schooling and conceptions of citizenship in early nineteenth-century Sweden, History of Education, 48:3, 297-316, DOI: 10.1080/0046760X.2018.1541482 [20 s.] 

Kock, Christian & Villadsen, Lisa Storm (2017) Rhetorical citizenship: studying the discursive crafting and enactment of citizenship, Citizenship Studies, 21:5, 570-586, DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2017.1316360 [17 s.] 

Kock, Christian, & Villadsen, Lisa Storm (red.) 2012. Rhetorical citizenship and public deliberation. Penn State Press. [Urval om ca 100 s.] 

Kock, Christian & Villadsen Lisa Storm (red.) 2014. Contemporary Rhetorical Citizenship. Leiden University Press. [Urval om ca 100 s.] 

Leff, Michael. ”Tradition and agency in humanistic rhetoric.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 36.2 (2003): 135-147. [13 s.] 

McKerrow, Raymie. 2014. "The Rhetorical Citizen: Enacting Agency" I: Kock, Christian & Villadsen Lisa Storm. Contemporary Rhetorical Citizenship. Leiden University Press, s. 239-256 [17 s.] 

Mouffe, Chantal. 2016. Agonistik: texter om att tänka världen politiskt. Stockholm: Atlas, s. 9-29, 33-41, 43-58, 81-100, 119-136, 147-153. [91 s.] 

Poulakos, Takos. (2004), ”Isocrates’ Civic Education and the Question of Doxa”, Poulakos, T. & Depew, D.J. (red.). 2004. Isocrates and Civic Education. (1st ed.) Austin: University of Texas Press, s. 44 – 65. [22 s.] 

Rountree, Clarke & Rountree, John (2014), ”Burke’s Pentad as a Guide for Symbol-Using Citizens”, Studies in Philosophy and Education 34:4, s. 349–362. [14 s.] 

Ruitenberg, Claudia.W. ”Educating Political Adversaries: Chantal Mouffe and Radical Democratic Citizenship Education”. Studies in Philosophy and Education 28, 269–281 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-008-9122-2 [13 s.] 

Rutten, Kris, & Soetaert, Ronald. "Rhetoric, Citizenship, and Cultural Literacy." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 15.3 (2013): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2242> 

Terrill, Robert E. (2016), ”Reproducing Virtue: Quintilian, Imitation, and Rhetorical Education”, Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 19:2, s. 157–171. [15 s.] 

Walzer, Arthur E. ”Parrēsia, Foucault, and the classical rhetorical tradition.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43.1 (2013): 1-21. [21 s.] 

 

Tillkommer ca 50 sidor forskningsartiklar och annan text som väljes i samråd med lärare. 

 

Totalt ca 900 s. 

 

Teori och metod  

 

Obligatorisk litteratur:

Campbell, Karlyn K. 2002. “Consiousness-raising: Linking Theory, Criticism, and Practice”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 32: 1, s. 45-64. [9 s.]  

   

Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2017. “Audience Analysis and Reception Studies of Rhetoric”. In Rhetorical Audience Studies and Reception of Rhetoric (Rhetoric, Politics and Society, pp. 1-42). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [42 s.]   

 

Rienecker, Lotta, Stray Jørgensen, Peter, & Lagerhammar, Ann. 2018. Att skriva en bra uppsats (Upplaga 4. ed.). Stockholm: Liber, s. 100–237. [ca 140 s.]   

 

Zarefsky, David. 2008. ”Knowledge claims in rhetorical criticism”. Journal of Communication, 58, s. 629–640. [31 s.]   

 

Warnick, Barbara. 2004. "The ethos of Rhetorical Criticism". I: Hyde, Michael J. The ethos of rhetoric. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, s. 56-74. [18 s.]  

 

Ödman, Per-Johan. 2007. Tolkning, förstĂĄelse, vetande: hermeneutik i teori och praktik. 2., [omarb.] uppl. Stockholm: Norstedts akademiska förlag. [254 s.]  

  

Tillkommer cirka 200 sidor i anslutning till seminarieuppgifter.   

 

Totalt cirka 700 sidor.  

   

Referenslitteratur:

Agnafors, Marcus & Levinsson, Magnus. 2019. Att tänka uppsats: det vetenskapliga arbetets grundstruktur. Malmö: Gleerups.   

 

Alvesson, Mats & Sköldberg, Kaj. 2008. Tolkning och reflektion: vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod. 2., [uppdaterade] uppl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.   

 

Hartman, Jan. 2004. Vetenskapligt tänkande: från kunskapsteori till metodteori. 2., [utök. och kompletterade] uppl. Lund: Studentlitteratur. 

  

Klujeff, Marie Lund, and Roer, Hanne. 2014. Retorikkens aktualitet: Grundbog i retorisk kritik. 3. Udg. Sprog i praksis, 1. Köpenhamn: Hans Reitzel.  

   

Kuypers, J. A., & Vlebooks. 2021. Rhetorical criticism perspectives in action (Third). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.  

Kvale, Steinar, Brinkmann, Svend, and Torhell, Sven-Erik. 2014. Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Tredje [reviderade] upplagan. Lund: Studentlitteratur.  

 

Porrovecchio, Mark J. & Condit, Celeste M. (eds.). 2016. Contemporary Rhetorical Theory: A Reader, second edition. New York: The Guilford Press.   

 

Rienecker, L., Stray Jørgensen, Peter, & Lagerhammar, Ann. 2018. Att skriva en bra uppsats (Upplaga 4).

Självständigt arbete 

 

Referenslitteratur:

Agnafors, Marcus & Levinsson, Magnus. 2019. Att tänka uppsats : det vetenskapliga arbetets grundstruktur. Malmö: Gleerups.   

Booth, Wayne C., Colomb, Gregory G., Williams, Joseph M., Bizup, Joseph & Fitzgerald, William T. 2016. The Craft of Research. Fourth edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.  

Rienecker, L., Stray Jørgensen, Peter, & Lagerhammar, Ann. 2018. Att skriva en bra uppsats (Upplaga 4. ed.). Stockholm: Liber.   

Svenska akademiens ordlista över svenska språket. 2006 [eller nyare], 13. uppl. [eller nyare] Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.   

Svenska skrivregler (2008 [eller nyare]). Stockholm: Liber.